In this, as in so much else, Ferguson has been no exception. Racists began blowing on this particular dog-whistle as soon as the murder of Michael Brown began to attract national attention.
Solution Preview Hi, Interesting topic! One approach to help you with a paper like this one is to look at information from various sources, which you can draw on for your final copy. This is the approach this response takes. I also attached a highly informative article to consider.
You are meeting with a few members of city council and the agenda is focused on social services for the poor. You find yourself engaged in a heated debate. Some members cite that the culture of poverty thesis suggests that the poor are largely responsible for their own poverty.
Others argue that this attitude essentially blames the victim and that, instead, poverty is caused by society's unequal distribution of wealth.
Which position do you agree with and why? Support your position with facts wherever possible?
One thesis to consider is: Although poverty is, at least in part, caused by society's unequal distribution of wealth, it is then distributed according to "the culture of poverty' theory.
In other words, the unequal distribution of wealth cause results in the "culture of poverty" effect. One argument is that poverty is based on the society's unequal distribution of wealth due to various contributing factors.
On the other hand, proponents of the generic broadly economic others argue that poverty is caused by society's unequal distribution of wealth. In other words, poverty can be best explained by general, economy-wide problems, such as inadequate non-poverty employment opportunities, inadequate overall demand macro problems, macro policy and low national income less developed country Source: Maxwell School, Syracuse University, http: It makes a difference how poverty is defined, such as society's unequal distribution of wealth.
For instance, suppose somehow we significantly reduce racial discrimination. Will total poverty fall? The proponents of the culture of poverty will answer unequivocally "yes".
Conversely, the proponents of the unequal distiribution will answer the opposite -"No!
Poverty will only be redistributed. Similarly, the culture of poverty proponents reply, "Yes, indeed! And, poverty will only be redistributed.Technically, the culture of poverty is a subculture of poor people in ghettos, poor regions, or social contexts where they develop a shared set of beliefs, values and norms for behavior that are separate from but embedded in the culture of the main society.
Critique the culture of poverty thesis Oscar Lewis introduced his idea of “a culture of poverty” in He developed the theory as a result of his work with the poor in Mexico and Puerto Rico. Culture of poverty is defined as a set of beliefs and values thought to exist among the poor which prevents them from escaping poverty (Browne ).
The culture of poverty thesis is similar to 'low class culture' theory where it has been argued by some that the lower class have developed and transmit to their children, a different set of cultural values and expectations. They also argue that culture of poverty is a barrier to the success of lower class in society.
explanations of poverty blame individuals: the culture of poverty thesis states that poverty is caused by shortcomings in the poor themselves blame society: poverty is caused by society's unequal distribution of wealth and lack of good jobs. The culture of poverty thesis is one of the most recurrent themes in American politics.
The culture of poverty thesis is controversial and is opposed by situational theory, which locates the genesis of poverty in economic and social structures of society rather than in the value orientations of individuals or groups.
Start studying Culture of Poverty Thesis. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.